On People and the System
My dear friend,
I want to start tonight with the truth I keep returning to: the system is not a machine. It is made of people. We blame it, we serve it, we try to reform it — and we forget that every line of policy, every decision in every distant office, was written by a human hand.
When I was younger, I believed the system was something distant and rigid. It felt like a fortress of invisible rules and unreachable decisions, a structure built to control rather than to care. I blamed it for everything that felt unfair - the slow approvals, the bureaucracy that delayed action, the processes that rewarded the privileged and exhausted the patient. I saw how injustice could hide behind words like policy and procedure. I saw people who deserved help being left behind because a line on a spreadsheet said no budget available.
Years later, when I finally joined headquarters after months and years of chasing that opportunity, I carried all of that with me - the frustration, the questions, and the stubborn belief that if I just got close enough to the system, I could change it.
After many years leading country operations, coordinating emergency responses, and managing assignments across regions that spanned the world, I had come to understand the true depth of this work. I had lived it closely. I knew how to design programs that responded to real needs, how to turn strategies into daily action, and how to balance urgency with patience. Years in the field had given me both experience and perspective. I felt ready — confident that I now had the skills, the context, and the clarity to contribute at a higher level, to help repair what often felt broken.
A few days into my new role, my manager invited me for coffee, a casual conversation to get to know each other. He smiled and said, “So tell me, why did you want to come to HQ? You’ve spent years in operations, leading teams, responding to crises, managing programs in some of the toughest places. Why move here - behind a desk, away from the field, away from the action?”
I didn’t give him a polished answer. I told him the truth. I said, “Because I’m frustrated. I’ve seen the system hurt people who were trying to do good work. I’ve seen injustice being protected by process. I’ve seen people with power and privilege get second chances while others were replaced, blamed, or forgotten. I’ve seen how hierarchy can silence honesty. I’ve raised issues, written reports, and even reached out to higher levels, but the higher I went, the quieter the answers became. I came here because I want to change that. I want to understand it from the inside.”
He listened carefully, stirring his coffee slowly. Then he looked at me and said, “Ali, the system is not a thing. The system is people.”
That sentence changed the way I saw everything.
He explained that systems are not designed in some abstract space. They are made in rooms by people who bring their fears, ambitions, and experiences with them. Every rule, every delay, every mistake comes from a person’s decision, hesitation, or history. Behind every policy, there is a memory. Behind every approval or rejection, there is someone trying to protect something, a job, a belief, a reputation, a sense of control.
At first, that idea made me uncomfortable. It was easier to think of the system as a faceless thing to fight against. It was harder to realize it was made of people like me. Because if that was true, then responsibility was not “out there.” It was here. It was shared.
In my first months in this work, I studied manuals, charts, and workflows, thinking I could learn how the system worked by reading about it. I memorized processes, frameworks, and reporting lines. But none of that explained what really made things move. What did were conversations, the quiet ones in the corridor, the long ones in coffee breaks, and the short glances exchanged in meetings. Those moments revealed how people actually navigated power, fear, and belonging.
After that conversation with my manager, I reflected, I began to notice things that no document could teach. The finance officer who refused automation was not resisting progress; she was afraid of losing her sense of purpose after twenty years of doing things by hand. The senior manager who never delegated tasks was not controlling; he had once been betrayed by someone he trusted. The program officer who delayed sign-offs was not careless; he carried guilt from a past decision that caused harm. Every “problem” was a person carrying a story.
When I began to see these stories, everything softened. The system stopped being a machine and became a mosaic of human choices, habits, and wounds. What looked like bureaucracy was often protection. What looked like inefficiency was often fear. What looked like resistance was often pain.
My friend, I learned that reform is not only technical. It is emotional. If you want to change systems, you must first understand the people holding them together - and why they hold so tightly. Sometimes it is not power they protect, but survival.
Now, whenever someone says “the system is broken,” I think of faces, not buildings. I think of the ones who try, who struggle, who stay late even when no one notices. I think of the ones who stay silent because they were once punished for speaking. I think of the ones who carry the weight of decisions too heavy for their titles.
The system is us — our stories, our choices, our courage, and our silence. It grows as we grow. It hardens when we harden. It reforms when we listen.
The candle beside me flickers. The wax gathers in uneven circles, soft at the edges, imperfect but still holding the flame. That, too, is what systems are like. They are held together by fragile, human hands that still try, even when tired.
So, my friend, when you feel angry at the system, pause and look for the people inside it. Ask what shaped them. Ask what they are afraid to lose. Ask what they are trying to protect. You might not fix everything, but you will begin to understand how change really happens. Because systems are not made of walls or words. They are made of us.
With understanding and resolve,
Ali Al Mokdad